When I applied to college a few years ago, one of my application essays told in exacting detail how I believed in the lost city of Atlantis and its cousin, Lemuria, and how when I got my degree in archaeology, I was going to find it, and prove all the believers right. Whether or not that essay helped me get into college I don't know, but my grand plan of majoring in anthropology turned into a physics major, then back into an anthro major, then into an English major, then history, then medieval and early modern studies, and finally I've rolled back around to classical studies, where at least I'm likely to at some point in time go on an archaeological dig, although I'm coming up on my junior year and have yet to take an anthro class. My search for Atlantis has been pushed aside in favor of ancient Greece and medieval Europe. But that doesn't mean I'm any less interested -- in Atlantis, the Ark of the Covenant, the Holy Grail, or a thousand other pieces of history that might be lost or might never have existed at all. I call them Archaeology Conspiracy Theories, or ACTs.
ACTs are both familiar and popular. Like many people, I grew up with the Indiana Jones movies, the first and third of which feature a pair of pretty well known ACTs in the form of the Ark of the Covenant and the Holy Grail. Atlantis, another ACT, has been featured all the time in books and movies; even Disney's taken an interest. The entire premise of Stargate and the TV series it spawned is based on an ACT. Lara Croft and The Mummy are both based on ACTs, real or imagined.
I put ACTs into a couple of different categories. The first one is archaeology-reality based, with sources from historical documents or structures. This includes the Ark of the Covenant, the Holy Grail, Atlantis, various Stonehenge theories, lost ancient civilizations, that sort of thing. The second one includes fictionalized ACTs: Lara Croft and The Mummy, fiction that's heavy on the adventure and light on whatever reality it's based on. Third is outer space: aliens built the Pyramids, Stargate.
Some conspiracy theories are less conspiracy-based than others: Stonehenge, the Sphinx, and the Pyramids clearly exist, although how in the world they were actually constructed is a question for the ages, and the Ark of the Covenant must have existed at one point, though who knows where it is now. Others, like suggesting that the Pyramids were landing pads for aliens, require a certain amount of willpower and belief to go along with. All of them make for a great story, though: just ask Lucas and Spielberg.
So what is it that's so fascinating about archaeology conspiracy theories? Well, I can't speak for anyone else, but I like the puzzle of them. It's fun, putting disconnected pieces together -- or rather, reading or watching someone else do the work -- and seeing what might pop out, however unlikely it is. And sometimes it is, indeed, very unlikely. I can't say that I always take what I read seriously, but a lot of the time, questions are raised that I didn't even know existed. Who mapped Antarctica? How and why were the Nazca Lines made? Where did the weathering on the Sphinx come from? What's up with the Oak Island Money Pit?
As a writer, I'm perfectly willing to take questions like that and run with them, the same way Hollywood does, although I tend to put them into fantasy. Sure, they're controversial; many things are. Sure, some of it is pretty crazy. But it's a hell of a lot of fun if you're into that kind of thing.
Book recs: I'm quite fond of Graham Hancock myself; he's a lot of fun and his books are extremely detailed. The three I've read are Fingerprints of the Gods: The Evidence of Earth's Lost Civilization, Underworld: The Mysterious Origins of Civilization, and The Sign and the Seal: The Quest for the Lost Ark of the Covenant.
While I generally don't actually read much beyond Hancock, other books I've read that I'd categorize in the same realm are The Coming Global Superstorm (inspiration for The Day After Tomorrow; Roland Emmerich apparently really likes ACTs) and God's Gold: A Quest for the Lost Temple Treasures of Jerusalem. While I haven't actually read it, Chariots of the Gods is a classic.
There's a fair amount of popular fiction that falls into ACT territory. Besides the movies mentioned above, Douglas Preston and Lincoln Child have a set of popular novels that tend to dance into the ACT realm. Clive Cussler and his Dirk Pitt novels fall definitely into ACT territory; the movie Sahara is based on the books. James Rollins appears to fall into the same realm, though I haven't read him myself. ACT fiction is generally strong on action and adventure and loose on historical accuracy; it tends to be male-dominated, but the characters are generally highly resourceful, competent, and intelligent. (Call me, Evie Carnahan! Rick can come too!) I wouldn't call it deep by a long shot, but it's a lot of fun.
ACTs are both familiar and popular. Like many people, I grew up with the Indiana Jones movies, the first and third of which feature a pair of pretty well known ACTs in the form of the Ark of the Covenant and the Holy Grail. Atlantis, another ACT, has been featured all the time in books and movies; even Disney's taken an interest. The entire premise of Stargate and the TV series it spawned is based on an ACT. Lara Croft and The Mummy are both based on ACTs, real or imagined.
I put ACTs into a couple of different categories. The first one is archaeology-reality based, with sources from historical documents or structures. This includes the Ark of the Covenant, the Holy Grail, Atlantis, various Stonehenge theories, lost ancient civilizations, that sort of thing. The second one includes fictionalized ACTs: Lara Croft and The Mummy, fiction that's heavy on the adventure and light on whatever reality it's based on. Third is outer space: aliens built the Pyramids, Stargate.
Some conspiracy theories are less conspiracy-based than others: Stonehenge, the Sphinx, and the Pyramids clearly exist, although how in the world they were actually constructed is a question for the ages, and the Ark of the Covenant must have existed at one point, though who knows where it is now. Others, like suggesting that the Pyramids were landing pads for aliens, require a certain amount of willpower and belief to go along with. All of them make for a great story, though: just ask Lucas and Spielberg.
So what is it that's so fascinating about archaeology conspiracy theories? Well, I can't speak for anyone else, but I like the puzzle of them. It's fun, putting disconnected pieces together -- or rather, reading or watching someone else do the work -- and seeing what might pop out, however unlikely it is. And sometimes it is, indeed, very unlikely. I can't say that I always take what I read seriously, but a lot of the time, questions are raised that I didn't even know existed. Who mapped Antarctica? How and why were the Nazca Lines made? Where did the weathering on the Sphinx come from? What's up with the Oak Island Money Pit?
As a writer, I'm perfectly willing to take questions like that and run with them, the same way Hollywood does, although I tend to put them into fantasy. Sure, they're controversial; many things are. Sure, some of it is pretty crazy. But it's a hell of a lot of fun if you're into that kind of thing.
Book recs: I'm quite fond of Graham Hancock myself; he's a lot of fun and his books are extremely detailed. The three I've read are Fingerprints of the Gods: The Evidence of Earth's Lost Civilization, Underworld: The Mysterious Origins of Civilization, and The Sign and the Seal: The Quest for the Lost Ark of the Covenant.
While I generally don't actually read much beyond Hancock, other books I've read that I'd categorize in the same realm are The Coming Global Superstorm (inspiration for The Day After Tomorrow; Roland Emmerich apparently really likes ACTs) and God's Gold: A Quest for the Lost Temple Treasures of Jerusalem. While I haven't actually read it, Chariots of the Gods is a classic.
There's a fair amount of popular fiction that falls into ACT territory. Besides the movies mentioned above, Douglas Preston and Lincoln Child have a set of popular novels that tend to dance into the ACT realm. Clive Cussler and his Dirk Pitt novels fall definitely into ACT territory; the movie Sahara is based on the books. James Rollins appears to fall into the same realm, though I haven't read him myself. ACT fiction is generally strong on action and adventure and loose on historical accuracy; it tends to be male-dominated, but the characters are generally highly resourceful, competent, and intelligent. (Call me, Evie Carnahan! Rick can come too!) I wouldn't call it deep by a long shot, but it's a lot of fun.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-09 12:22 am (UTC)Also, I know why Stonehenge was built. A Wiltshire friend of mine told me that a bunch of lads several thousand years ago left the pub at closing time, weren't ready to go to bed and decided to build something to confuse everyone.
Having been in several rural Wiltshire pubs at closing time, I have no problem with this theory whatsoever.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-13 07:02 pm (UTC)That sounds like a perfectly reasonable theory!
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-09 12:34 am (UTC)Coconut fibre, metal pieces, all those different types of wood...SO COOL. It reminds me a lot of the insulation used between the two spheres in Abhorsen by Garth Nix - have you read?
*just got to the bit about Marie Antoinette* Dude. Dude. This is so cool.
And all the folkloric history surrounding it! Wow.
*sealclap of happy*
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-09 02:07 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-09 02:34 am (UTC)where the hell is my abhorson icon?!
Date: 2010-05-09 03:35 pm (UTC)The Bells!! Waverly College! The Clayr!!! Mind if I subscribe?
OMG YOU'RE FROM MY AREA OF THE WORLD.
Re: where the hell is my abhorson icon?!
Date: 2010-05-09 04:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-10 08:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-13 07:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-09 12:52 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-09 12:53 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-13 06:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-13 07:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-09 01:00 am (UTC)(You don't know me - I think I found this post via 3W4DW? I am new to DW and casting around for like-minded folk...we appear to have shared interests...mind if I subscribe?)
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-09 02:38 am (UTC)(Though I don't see AP as being particularly ACT. She's more just (hah! just?) an archaeologist!heroine to me? Unless I'm forgetting important things.)
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-09 04:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-09 04:23 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-13 06:55 pm (UTC)Go ahead!
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-09 01:01 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-09 01:12 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-13 06:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-13 10:33 pm (UTC)I think there's a new book out this month that's part of the series, but I haven't even read the last one out yet.
(I hope you don't mind, but I've friended you here since you're posting more on DW than on LJ these days.)
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-09 01:45 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-09 01:56 am (UTC)Another good ACT fiction author is David Gibbins.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-10 12:07 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-11 05:50 am (UTC)Also, one of these days I need to use the theory that the pyramids were made by crazy people wielding mammoths in 10,000 BC in a paper. :D
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-13 06:51 pm (UTC)Roland Emmerich (who did 10,000 BC) is apparently very fond of ACTs -- between 10,000 BC, Stargate, and The Day After Tomorrow, well.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-14 03:52 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-13 05:39 pm (UTC)Other movies/books would definitely include Dan Brown's Angels and Demons and The Davinci Code. National Treasure and a bunch of other mega-million dollar hits.
You've made me realize how much I like this genre!
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-13 06:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-16 07:18 pm (UTC)I never thought to connect ACT as a fannish genre but it totally is and one that I love as well. It would make a fun com.