things that crack me up
Sep. 7th, 2010 07:11 pmThe difference between classicists and medievalists in their idea of a good movie:
CLASSICIST: Troy was such a terrible movie! How could anyone enjoy that? Kingdom of Heaven, now, that was a good movie.
MEDIEVALIST: Kingdom of Heaven is such a ridiculous movie! How could anyone make the Crusades that boring? Troy, now, that was a good movie.
CLASSICIST: Troy was such a terrible movie! How could anyone enjoy that? Kingdom of Heaven, now, that was a good movie.
MEDIEVALIST: Kingdom of Heaven is such a ridiculous movie! How could anyone make the Crusades that boring? Troy, now, that was a good movie.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-09-08 12:19 am (UTC)Outlander though? I flove that movie ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥
(no subject)
Date: 2010-09-08 12:46 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-09-08 01:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-09-08 01:08 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-09-08 12:21 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-09-08 01:05 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-09-08 01:28 am (UTC)(Do the medievalists also like Gladiator?)
(no subject)
Date: 2010-09-08 01:34 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-09-08 03:13 am (UTC)For some reason what drives me BATS about Troy is the horses and tack. They should've been riding hill ponies, if anything, and they certainly should not have had STIRRUPS. BAH.
KoH was... well, awful. I watched it with my Crusades lecturer and a bunch of classmates, hanging out in his holiday house at one point. He enjoyed stopping the film and saying "now what's wrong with this scene??" (To which we said uh... Orlando Bloom couldn't forge anything to save his life; no arm muscles. Apparently the correct answer was actually that the method of smelting depicted wasn't invented for another century or so.) But it did get something about the eschatalogical concept of Jerusalem, I think. You could see it in the colour cast - all dim and blue for Europe, and red and gold for the Holy Land. Now, then they took that all off in the wrong direction with the "multicultural paradise" angle, but w/evs. They gave us the sense that the Kingdom of Jerusalem was somehow just... land and yet something so much more.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-09-08 03:31 am (UTC)I haven't watched either movie in such a long time -- I think I may not have seen Kingdom of Heaven since it was in theatres?
I am almost certainly dropping this class, but my Greek and Roman Magic professor briefly got sidetracked today by talking about Troy and how much he hated the portrayal of Paris by Orlando Bloom, because it meant that Orlando Bloom was no longer awesome! Because he'd loved him as Legolas as Lord of the Rings! But he was a terrible Paris! Except that's how Paris was characterized in the Iliad, so actually great casting! But Legolas was so much more awesome, and Orlando Bloom was only somewhat redeemed in Pirates of the Caribbean, but still overshadowed by Johnny Depp! But he was awesome as Legolas!
(no subject)
Date: 2010-09-08 05:22 am (UTC)and Kingdom of Heaven included a scene in which Orlando Bloom invented irrigation.
I think they both lose. *g*
(Although I do like Eva Green.)
(no subject)
Date: 2010-09-08 09:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-09-08 06:29 am (UTC)And then the medievalists, Celticists, and Arthurianists (a lot of us are all three!) will add that also, King Arthur is FUCKING TERRIBLE. LEATHER BIKINI WHAT NO WRONG.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-09-08 10:37 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-09-08 07:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-09-08 07:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-09-08 09:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-09-09 12:07 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-09-09 02:11 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-09-09 05:48 pm (UTC)Yeah.
/o\
(no subject)
Date: 2010-09-08 10:36 am (UTC)And then... oh christ. 'Cousin. Totally my cousin. in conclusion. Cousin.'
Just as someone who read the legends as a kid it was so much fail. never mind the historical. When I ranted on the cutting out the gay, you get people going 'so they cut that out, so...?' And then you have to point out that the Patrocles thing is a MAJOR PLOT POINT re: Achilles going batshit. Briseis was a property issue, that was it!
Gladiator. :pets you and your history fail:
King Arthur is my out-and-proud guilty pleasure. Dude. the trailer was so pretty. And then they get one of the most famous dates in British history wrong. Cue whiplash of '...I'm sorry, but getting orders from the Roman Empire post-410 AD? AHAAHAHAHAHA.' And then bloody great rolling forests north of the wall. And Saxons attacking from the North, as opposed to the bits of the country named after them. After that I just sat back and reached for the popcorn. (Directors Cut, they re-inserted the blood and changed a couple of bits, so plot makes a bit more sense) I have no issue with the leather crop top. She's a Geordie. Remove the breeches, *then* she'll be wearing the right amount of clothing.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-09-08 10:03 pm (UTC)I'm reading the Iliad right now for class, and -- yeah. *shakes head* Actually, it's kind of fascinating how so much of what we take for gospel from Homer re: the Trojan War doesn't actually come from the Iliad at all. Hektor totally knew he was killing Patroklos and not Achilles! There is so much violence and bloodshed! Odysseus is awesome, but that's a given, never mind anything.
Gladiator is just. Argh. I mean, if you're going to mess with the history, at least do it in a reasonably entertaining way? When one actually makes ROMAN HISTORY boring, you're doing something very wrong. But on the other hand, it is SO PRETTY.
Oh my God, King Arthur and the history fail. But yes. So pretty.